Thaths a good question. I had the same idea.
I think there are some colon like cams on the market. But I don't know, if they are safe.

Would be interesting vids I think

I search for stuff like that from time to time for years now and all i got currently is this:
Conventional Endoscopes, which would fit perfectly as they are made for such stuff are by far too expensive for people like us. One of the cheapest systems i know costs roundabout 10 k$ and is originally intended for industrial use. Medical units seem to range about 20 K$ and more.

Alternatively, i thought about building my own one, but that's probably tricky.

- I thought of using one of the better finger cams, one of those that have a macro-function. Such are pretty effortable, good and small (!) models can be obtained around 200 $.
- Illumination could be realized by LE-Diodes or IR-LEDs, these are another few bucks .
- The encasement is again is quite tricky, i'd prefer very soft, gel-style platinum-catalyzed silicone as i have a source for that stuff. Material costs would probably tend to 50-100 $.
- All the optical stuff has to be encased in a dry environment in order to avoid fogging of the front lens. That's one problem still to solve, probably by another front lens made of polycarbonate.
- Additionally, i'd add a vented hose to inflate air, as imaging and navigation otherwise will be unsatisfactory.

Possible problems one can think of:
- Fogging of the camera front lens if there is trapped huminidty in the system (either from manufacturing or usage)
- Break-through of signal lines or air-hose through the silicone mantle. Proper fixation of that stuff is as important as difficult and gets even more difficult, the longer the device is planned.

So i think, all that stuff should be solveable with roughly 300-400 $ if one doesn't need several attempts In the end, the cam could be shaped like the colon snake or colon aconda (which in my opinion is kinda too thick). But planning and working on such a project is quite time-consuming, and that's pretty most the thing i am *really* lack of.

But we could try to realize at least the planning part here, maybe someone then is interested in building one...


Best regards,
Thrawn

I already heard about the Pleasure Periscope, but that's kinda different of what i am thinking

First, it has no optics inside. As the name already suggests, it works like a simple periscope and therefore imaging is pretty poor.
Second, there is no way for taking proper pictures of what you can see inside - or should i say "could"?
Third and last: It is not flexible and therfore quite boring - for vaginal games, a clear speculum is surely more fun, for anal games the lack of flexibility kills all usage.

In other words: A good gape probably allows better imaging

That's exactly my opinion. One can ingnore the mantle of the cam, if it is embedded in silicone, but the other points are anyway tricky enough.

Well, the Buttcam-Stuff is of pretty low resolution and especially the newer clips are -IMHO- quite boring cut...
But anyway a nice hint for those who don't know these guys yet. :-)

Well - we're serious men: We care about the inner values of people. 


Best regards,
Thrawn

I made one with a Hanna Webcam and a stick. Unfortunately it does not work very well because the cam is mounted on a stick so the view tends to be blocked by the colon wall. To make this work, the head needs to swivel and the direction needs to be controllable to get a proper view.

I may build a mount out of micro-servos one day. Then I can use my DX7 (RC helicopter transmitter) to explore the inside of my body....